Skip to content
PlacementGraph™
Audience taxonomy

What does the IAB Audience Taxonomy actually classify?

Part of Contextual targeting

The short answer

The IAB Tech Lab Audience Taxonomy is a standard list of names for audience segments, grouped at the top into demographic, interest and purchase intent. It describes groups of people, browsers or devices that a data provider has put into a segment. It does not describe pages, so it answers a different question from the Content Taxonomy.

Key takeaways

  • The Audience Taxonomy standardizes segment names so that segments from different data providers can be compared, not the rules used to build them.
  • Its top tier says whether a segment claims a demographic attribute, an interest or a purchase intent, and each needs different evidence.
  • Content categories describe what a page is about; a page category is never proof of who reads it.
  • Before using an audience label, a buyer should see the provider's disclosure of where the data came from, how old it is and whether it was modeled.

What does the IAB Audience Taxonomy classify?

Definition

Audience Taxonomy
An IAB Tech Lab list of standard names for audience segments, organized in tiers under three top-level groups: Demographic, Interest and Purchase Intent.

Tech Lab's taxonomies repository (opens in a new tab) states the purpose plainly: the Audience Taxonomy provides common nomenclature for audience segment names to improve comparability of data across different providers, and its Tier 1 labeling designates whether a segment describes attributes that are demographic, interest-based or purchase-intent based. The same page calls it a key element of Tech Lab's Data Transparency Standard. Version 1.1 is described there as a non-breaking update to version 1.0.

The subject of every row is an audience, meaning a group of people, households, browsers or devices that a data provider has assigned to a segment. That is the main difference from the IAB Content Taxonomy, whose subject is a page, app or video. A contextual plan uses the second. Audience labels show up beside it in data marketplaces, curated deals and bid requests, which is why planners need to tell them apart.

Audience Taxonomy 1.1 by top tier: our count of the TSV file in Tech Lab's GitHub repository, read October 2026
Top tierRowsTier 2 groupsExamples of Tier 2 groups
Demographic1977Age Range, Education & Occupation, Household Data, Language, Personal Finance
Interest49729Business and Finance, Food & Drink, Home & Garden, Travel, Video Gaming
Purchase Intent86434Business and Industrial, Consumer Packaged Goods, Software, Travel and Tourism
Total1,55870IDs in the file run from 1 to 1679, so numbers have gaps

How do demographic, interest and purchase intent segments differ?

The three top tiers make three different kinds of claim. A demographic segment says something about who a person or household is: an age range, an education level, a household income band or a home location, where the file points to ISO country and region codes. An interest segment says what someone pays attention to, with names that can mirror content subjects, such as Interest, Business and Finance, Small and Medium-sized Business. A purchase intent segment says someone is in the market for a product or service, and every purchase intent row in the file carries the note See Purchase Intent Classification Extension.

The three top tiers and what each one asks a buyer to believe
Top tierThe claimPossible evidence behind itWhat goes stale
DemographicThis person or household has an attributeRegistration forms, surveys, public records or a modelMoves, job changes and life events
InterestThis person pays repeated attention to a subjectPages visited, apps used or content consumed over timeInterests fade, and one visit is weak evidence
Purchase IntentThis person is shopping for something nowSearches, product page visits, cart or price comparison activityIntent ends at purchase or after a short window

Recency matters for purchase intent segments. Tech Lab's 2022 guidance shows audience IDs carrying Purchase Intent Classification modifiers joined by a pipe character, in the form 123|PIFI2|PIPV1, so a provider can say more about the intent signal than the name alone. Ask whether a segment uses those modifiers and what each value means for that provider.

Why is a content category not proof of who reads a page?

A content category is a description of the page. Tech Lab's taxonomy implementation guide (opens in a new tab) says the Content Taxonomy simply categorizes page content and does not on its own reveal information about a user. A small business payroll article is read by owners, but also by accountants, students, job seekers and people who followed a link by accident. The page category tells a buyer what the reader chose to read in that moment, nothing more.

The same guide warns that there are few technical controls preventing taxonomy nodes being associated with individual IDs to build behavioral profiles over time. That is the path by which a content label turns into an audience label: someone logs which categories a browser visited and calls the result an interest. At that point the claim has changed object, from a page to a person, and it needs the evidence and privacy review that come with audience data.

What a label is about and what it claims
What a label is about and what it claimsContent labels describe pages; audience labels describe people. Trouble starts when one is presented as the other. Contextual plan: Page category with matching pages shown. Disclosed segment: Audience label with a data label. Loose topic tag: Page label with no evidence shown. Unsupported claim: Page topic sold as an audienceContextual planPage category with matching pages shownDisclosed segmentAudience label with a data labelLoose topic tagPage label with no evidence shownUnsupported claimPage topic sold as an audienceLabel describes a personLabel is backed by disclosed evidence
What a label is about and what it claimsContent labels describe pages; audience labels describe people. Trouble starts when one is presented as the other. Contextual plan: Page category with matching pages shown. Disclosed segment: Audience label with a data label. Loose topic tag: Page label with no evidence shown. Unsupported claim: Page topic sold as an audienceContextualplanPage categorywith matchingpages shownDisclosedsegmentAudience labelwith a data labelLoose topictagPage label withno evidence shownUnsupportedclaimPage topic soldas an audienceLabel describes a personLabel is backed by disclosed evidence
Content labels describe pages; audience labels describe people. Trouble starts when one is presented as the other.

Where do audience and content labels meet in a bid request?

In OpenRTB they travel in the same kind of container, attached to different parents. The OpenRTB 2.6 specification (opens in a new tab) says the Data and Segment objects together allow additional data about the related object, for example user or content, to be specified. The User object's data field holds additional user data, and the Content object's data field holds additional content data. The segtax community extension (opens in a new tab) adds a taxonomy ID to each Data object and says segment IDs should be considered fully proprietary when no segtax is provided.

How to tell an audience label from a content label in a bid request
What to look atAudience labelContent label
Parent objectuser.datasite.content.data or app.content.data
segtax value in the extension list4, IAB Tech Lab Audience Taxonomy 1.15, 6 or 7 for Content Taxonomy 2.1, 2.2 or 3.0
Data.nameThe provider that built the segmentThe provider that classified the content
What a match meansThe browser or device was placed in a segmentThe page or video was given a category

Content categories can also arrive outside these objects, in fields such as the site's cat, sectioncat and pagecat arrays or the content object's cat array. Those describe the page. A segment ID with no segtax value is the provider's own code, so its meaning has to come from the provider's documentation.

What does an audience label review look like on a real brief?

Fictional example

A payroll software brief for Nevada restaurants

An unnamed Reno software company sells payroll and shift scheduling to small restaurants in Reno and Las Vegas. The agency builds a contextual plan from restaurant operations content: articles on tip pooling, staff scheduling for weekend rushes and opening a second location. Each site on the list carries a reason tied to its sampled articles.

A data partner then offers three segments to layer on top: Interest, Business and Finance, Small and Medium-sized Business; Purchase Intent, Business and Industrial, Human Resources; and Demographic, Education & Occupation, Self Employed. The planner records each one as a separate audience claim, apart from the contextual reasons, and asks for the provider's data label before anything is added to the plan.

The client deck keeps the two layers apart. The contextual line reads: pages about running a restaurant. The audience line reads: browsers a named provider placed in three segments, under disclosed rules. Nothing in the deck says that restaurant owners read the listed sites.

What should a buyer ask before using an audience segment label?

Tech Lab's Data Transparency Standard is the disclosure that should come with a segment. The 2022 guidance describes it as a schema of over 20 fields setting minimum disclosure requirements for any seller of data, and says the disclosures aim to clarify provenance, age, extent of modeling and segmentation criteria but do not themselves constitute a quality determination. Its inclusion methodology field separates attributes that are observed or known, declared by the audience members, derived from other fields, inferred from business rules, or modeled with an algorithm from a seed.

Six questions for any audience segment

  1. Ask which taxonomy row it maps to. Get the Audience Taxonomy ID and version, not only a marketing name.
  2. Ask how members got in. Observed, declared, derived, inferred and modeled are different strengths of evidence.
  3. Ask how old the data is. Purchase intent loses meaning fast, so ask for the window and the rule for leaving the segment.
  4. Ask what unit is counted. Individual, household, business, device and browser segments are not the same size or the same claim.
  5. Ask whether lookalike expansion was used. The standard's audience expansion field records whether similar IDs were added.
  6. Ask where the data was collected. The geography field lists countries, which matters for a plan limited to the United States or Canada.

How does PlacementGraph keep content claims apart from audience claims?

Frequently asked questions

Do two segments with the same taxonomy label contain the same people?

No. A shared label means two providers chose the same standard name for their segments. Each provider applies its own rules, sources and time windows, so the members can differ. Comparing the data labels side by side shows how far apart the two segments really are.

Can a publisher's first-party segment use the Audience Taxonomy?

Yes. Tech Lab's 2022 guidance describes publishers and their data partners signaling seller defined audiences with Audience Taxonomy IDs in user.data, with segtax identifying the taxonomy. The renamed Curated Audiences specification continues that work; our guide to curated audiences covers it.

Why do audience and content taxonomies use similar names?

Because interests can be about the same subjects that pages cover. Food & Drink, Travel and Home & Garden appear in both. The names match, but the object does not: one says a page is about travel, the other says a person was placed in a travel interest segment. Always check which taxonomy an ID belongs to.

Is the Audience Taxonomy used for Canadian plans?

It can be, with care. Its income bands are labeled in US dollars, and its location rows point to ISO codes and, for the United States, two-letter state codes. A Canadian plan should confirm how a provider handles provinces, Canadian dollars and French-language data before relying on a segment.

Sources

  1. Taxonomies (repository README) (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab
  2. Audience Taxonomy 1.1 (TSV) (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab
  3. Taxonomy and Data Transparency Standards to Support Seller-defined Audience and Context Signaling (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab, 2022
  4. Taxonomy implementation guide (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab
  5. Segment Taxonomies community extension (segtax) (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab
  6. OpenRTB 2.6 (opens in a new tab)IAB Tech Lab

Researched and written by PlacementGraph Research. Read how we research, source and update these pages. Corrections: diana@placementgraph.com.

HOW AGENCIES WORK WITH US

From your first brief.
To your next campaign.

Share a brief in plain language. Get contextual websites and YouTube channels that fit it, with the evidence behind every pick and a deal ready for your usual buying platform.

  1. 01

    Share your brief

    The campaign in plain language.

  2. 02

    Get your shortlist

    The strongest contextual sites and channels, with the evidence behind each.

  3. 03

    We build the deal

    Your shortlist becomes a curated deal through our exchange partners.

  4. 04

    Activate and grow

    Buy in your usual platform. Agencies earn benefits as their investment grows.

LET’S WORK TOGETHER

Your next campaign starts here.

Your details will only be used to respond to your enquiry.

Prefer email? diana@placementgraph.com

YOUR PRIVACY

You choose whether to allow optional analytics. You can use the whole website either way.

Change or withdraw consent at any time using “Cookie preferences” in the footer. Turning analytics off stops future collection and removes this site’s analytics cookies; it does not erase information already sent. The page may refresh to apply withdrawal.